HOME > Áø·á°ú/ÀÇ·áÁø¼Ò°³ > Áø·á°ú/ÀÇ·áÁø
 
 
 

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-tex¨Þ)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¾È¸éºÎ ¹Ì¿ë¼ö¼úÀÇ °æÇè

À¯¿µÃµ·Á¤½ÂÀÏ·¾ç¿ø¿ë·°í¹ý¹Î
°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ¼ºÇüÀǰúÇб³½Ç

Experience with use of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene(Gore-tex¨Þ) in Cosmetic Facial Surgery
Young Cheun Yoo, M.D., Seung I1 Chung, M.D., Won Yong Yang, M.D., Bub Min Ko, M.D.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,
College of Medicine, KyungHee University, Seoul, Korea

 

To date, for facial soft tissue augmentation, numerous implant materials have been used, including autogenous, homogenous, and alloplastic grafts. Among these, the porous material, Gore-tex¨Þ has a pore (0.5-30 microns, average 22 microns) which allows sufficient but limited soft tissue ingrowth to anchor implants, but not so much to make removal difficult or destructive to adjacent structures. In addition, this material has some advantage: non-carcinogenic, non-allergic, less capsule formation and reduced chance of infection due to high vascularity. In the past years Gone-tex¨Þ has found multiple applications in facial plastic and reconstructive surge±³. However this alloplastic material can be associated with potentially severe complications and side effects such as soft tissue reaction, infection, extrusion, exposure, etc. there have been also adverse criticism of Gore-tex¨Þ relative difficulties in postoperative removal, in carving implant, higher infection and extrusion rates in scarred tissue and thicker implant as well as postoperative volume reduction. In order to analyze results depending on the implantation site, the presence of scar on recipient site, thickness and type of implant, a retrospective chart review of 56 patients(69 cases) was undertaken of all patients who underwent facial soft tissue augmentation with Gore-tex¨Þ graft from November l998 to November 2001 in a wide variety of situations. All cases were categorized as either prima±³(normal recipient site) or seconda±³(scarred recipient site) cases and the thickness of each graft used in millimeters was recorded. Postoperative follow up revealed a stable implant material with no major complications relating to the graft material and no differences  in  developing  complications  according  to  the implantation site, the presence of scar, thickness and type of implant. All patients were highly satisfied with their results.

Key Words:Expanded polytetrafluoroehtylene(Gore-tex¨Þ), Soft tissue augmentation