HOME > Áø·á°ú/ÀÇ·áÁø¼Ò°³ > Áø·á°ú/ÀÇ·áÁø
 
 
 

±Þ¼º ´ã³¶¿°¿¡ À־ ÀÀ±Þ º¹°­°æ ´ã³¶ÀýÁ¦¼úÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû À¯¿ë¼º

Á¤½Â±Ô·ÀÌ»ó¸ñ·°í¿µ°ü·È«¼ºÈ­·ÁÖÈïÀç
°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Clinical Usefulness of Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Patient with Acute Cholecystitis
Seung Kyu Jeong, M.D., Sang Mok Lee, M.D., Young Gwan Ko, M.D.
Sung Wha Hong, M.D., Hoong Zae Joo, M.D.
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea

 

This study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic significance of emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of General Surgery Kyunghee University Hospital from July l995 to December l996 were analyzed retrospectively.

In this study, the patients were classified into two groups; the emergency group that underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the elective group that underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Twenty-one patients(8,9%) comprised the emergency group and 216 patients(91.1%) were in the elective group. Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed under the following conditions: (l) acute cholecystitis without improvement of symptoms after conservative management over 24 hours; (2) those ultrasonographically diagnosed as GB empyema, gangrenous GB, or perforated GB. Clinical features, operative time, conversion rate, post-operative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were compared. The most common disease was GB empyema in the emergency group (l3 cases, 61.9%) and chronic cholecystitis in the elective group (192 cases, 88.9%). There were no differences in age and sex distribution. As compared to the elective group; the mean operative time was significantly longer in the emergency group (p<0.05), l43 min. vs 94 min.; no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay, 4.9 days vs 3.8 days(p>0.05); the post-operative complications were significantly more common in the emergency group(p<0.05), 23.8%(5 cases) vs 4.1%(9 cases); no significant difference in the conversion rate(p>0.05), 0% vs l.9%(4 cases).

In conclusion, emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be a safe and useful method for acute chloecystitis in spite of longer operative time and more common post-operative complications as compared to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy because it, has the advantages of laparosopic surgery.

Key Words: Acute cholecystitis, Laparosopic cholecystectomy